Str. In the case of democracy, however, whether the multitude rule those who have property by violence or with their willing consent, and whether the laws are carefully observed or not, no one ever habitually changes the name.
Y. Soc. True.
Str. Now then, do we believe that any of these forms of government which are defined by the distinctions between the one, the few, and the many, or wealth and poverty, or violence and willingness, or written constitution and absence of laws, is a right one?
Y. Soc. I don’t see why not.
Str. Look a bit more closely along the line I am going to point out.
Y. Soc. What is it?
Str. Shall we abide by what we said in the beginning, or dissent from it?
Y. Soc. To what do you refer?
Str. We said, I believe, that royal power was one of the sciences.
Y. Soc. Yes.
Str. And not only a science, but we selected it from the rest as a science of judgement and command.
Y. Soc. Yes.
Str. And from the science of command we distinguished one part which rules inanimate works, and one which rules living beings; and so we have gone on dividing in this manner to the present moment, never forgetting that it is a science, but as yet unable to state with sufficient accuracy what science it is.
Y. Soc. You are right.
Str. Then is this our understanding, that the distinction between forms of government ought not to be found in the words few or many, or voluntary or unwilling, or wealth or poverty, but some science must be the distinguishing feature, if we are to be consistent with our previous statement?
Y. Soc. Yes, indeed; it cannot be otherwise.
Str. Necessarily, then, our present duty is to inquire in which, if any, of these forms of government is engendered the science of ruling men, which is about the greatest of sciences and the most difficult to acquire. We must discover that in order to see what men are to be distinguished from the wise king—men, I mean, who pretend to be, and make many believe that they are, statesmen, but are really not such at all.
Y. Soc. Yes, we must do this; that is implied in what was said before.
Str. Does it seem at all possible that a multitude in a state could acquire this science?
Y. Soc. By no means.
Str. But in a state of one thousand men could perhaps a hundred or as many as fifty acquire it adequately?