Str. Well, even at that stage of our discussion all animals had already been divided into tame and wild. For if their nature admits of domestication they are called tame; if it does not, they are called wild.
Y. Soc. Excellent.
Str. But the science we are hunting for was, and is, to be sought among tame creatures, more specifically creatures in herds.
Y. Soc. Yes.
Str. Let us, then, not make our division as we did before, with a view to all, nor in a hurry, with the idea that we may thus reach political science quickly, for that has already brought upon us the proverbial penalty.
Y. Soc. What penalty?
Str. The penalty of having made less speed, because we made too much haste and did not make our division right.
Y. Soc. And it was a good thing for us, Stranger
Str. I do not deny it. So let us begin again and try to divide the art of tending animals in common; for perhaps the information you desire so much will come to you in the ordinary course of our conversation better than by other means. Tell me—
Y. Soc. What?
Str. Whether, as I suppose, you have often heard people speak of this,— for I know you never actually saw the preserves of fish in the Nile and in the ponds of the Persian king. But perhaps you have noticed the like in fountain-pools.
Y. Soc. Yes, I have often seen the fish in fountain-pools and have heard many tales of those foreign preserves.
Str. And surely, even if you have not wandered over the plains of Thessaly, you have heard of goose-farms and crane-farms there and you believe that they exist.
Y. Soc. Yes, of course.
Str. The reason why I asked you all these questions is that the rearing of flocks is in part aquatic and in part an affair of the dry land.
Y. Soc. Yes, that is true.
Str. Then do you agree that we ought to divide the art of tending animals in common into corresponding parts, assigning one part of it to each of these two, and calling one the art of aquatic-herding and the other the art of land-herding?
Y. Soc. Yes, I agree.
Str. And surely we shall not have to ask to which of these two arts kingship belongs, for that is clear to everyone.
Y. Soc. Of course.
Str. Anybody could doubtless make a division of the art of tending herds on land.
Y. Soc. What would the division be?
Str. Into the tending of flying and walking animals.
Y. Soc. Very true.
Str. And statesmanship is to be sought in connection with walking animals, is it not? Any fool, so to speak, would believe that, don’t you think?
Y. Soc. Of course.
Str. And the art of tending animals that walk must, like an even number, be divided in half.
Y. Soc. Evidently.