You certainly have heard it often, but now you either do not apprehend or again you are minded to make trouble for me
by attacking the argument. I suspect it is rather the latter. For you have often heard Footnote 1Plato assumed that the reader will understand that the unavailing quest for
the good
in the earlier dialogues is an anticipation of the idea of good. Cf. Vol. I. on 476 A and What Plato Said, p. 71. Wilamowitz, Platon, i. p. 567, does not understand. that the greatest thing to learn is the idea of good Footnote 2Cf. 508 E, 517 C, Cratyl. 418 E. Cf. Phileb. 64 E and What Plato Said, p. 534, on Phaedo 99 A. Plato is unwilling to confine his idea of good to a formula and so seems to speak of it as a mystery. It was so regarded throughout antiquity (cf. Diog. Laert. iii. 27), and by a majority of modern scholars. Cf. my Idea of Good in Plato’s Republic, pp. 188-189, What Plato Said, pp. 72, 230-231, Introd. Vol. I. pp. xl-xli, and Vol. II. pp. xxvii, xxxiv. by reference to which Footnote 3Lit. the use of which, i.e. a theory of the cardinal virtues is scientific only if deduced from an ultimate sanction or ideal. just things Footnote 4The omission of the article merely gives a vaguely generalizing color. It makes no difference. and all the rest become useful and beneficial. And now I am almost sure you know that this is what I am going to speak of and to say further that we have no adequate knowledge of it. And if we do not know it, then, even if without the knowledge of this we should know all other things never so well, you are aware that it would avail us nothing, just as no possession either is of any avail Footnote 5For the idiom οὐδὲν ὄφελος Cf. Euthyph. 4 E, Lysis 208 E, 365 B, Charm. 155 E, etc. without the possession of the good. Or do you think there is any profit Footnote 6Cf. 427 A, Phaedr. 275 C, Cratyl. 387 A, Euthyd. 288 E, Laws 751 B, 944 C, etc. in possessing everything except that which is good, or in understanding all things else apart from the good while understanding and knowing nothing that is fair and good Footnote 7καλὸν δὲ καὶ ἀγαθόν suggests but does not mean καλοκἀγαθόν in its half-technical sense. The two words fill out the rhythm with Platonic fulness and are virtual synonyms. Cf. Phileb. 65 A and Symp. 210-211 where because of the subject the καλόν is substituted for the ἀγαθόν. ?No, by Zeus, I do not,
he said.
But, furthermore, you know this too, that the multitude believe pleasure Footnote 8So Polus and Callicles in the Gorgias and later the Epicureans and Cyrenaics. Cf. also What Plato Said, p. 131; Eurip. Hippol. 382
οἱ δ’ ἡδονὴν προθέντες ἀντὶ τοῦ καλοῦ
, and on 329 A-B. There is no contradiction here with the Philebus. Plato does not himself say that either pleasure or knowledge is the good. to be the good, and the finer Footnote 9κομψοτέροις is very slightly if at all ironical here. Cf. the American sophisticated
in recent use. See too Theaet. 156 A, Aristot. Eth. Nic 1905 a 18 οἱ χαρίεντες
. spirits intelligence or knowledge. Footnote 10Plato does not distinguish synonyms in the style of Prodicus (Cf. Protag. 337 A ff.) and Aristotle (Cf. Eth. Nic. 1140-1141) when the distinction is irrelevant to his purpose. Certainly.
And you are also aware, my friend, that those who hold this latter view are not able to point out what knowledge Footnote 11Cf. Euthyd. 281 D, Theaet. 288 D f., Laws 961 E
ὁ περὶ τί νοῦς
. See Unity of Plato’s Thought, n. 650. The demand for specification is frequent in the dialogues. Cf. Euthyph. 13 D, Laches 192 E, Gorg. 451 A, Charm. 165 C-E, Alc. I. 124 E ff. it is but are finally compelled to say that it is the knowledge of the good.Most absurdly,
he said. Is it not absurd,
said I, if while taunting us with our ignorance of the good they turn about and talk to us as if we knew it? For they say it is the knowledge of the good, Footnote 12There is no
the
in the Greek. Emendations are idle. Plato is supremely indifferent to logical precision when it makes no difference for a reasonably intelligent reader. Cf. my note on Phileb. 11 B-C in Class. Phil. vol. iii. () pp. 343-345. as if we understood their meaning when they utter Footnote 13φθέγξωνται logically of mere physical utterance (Cf. Theaet. 157 B), not, I think, as Adam says, of high-sounding oracular utterance. the word good.
Most true,
he said. Well, are those who define the good as pleasure infected with any less confusion Footnote 14Lit. wandering, the mark of error. Cf. 484 B, Lysis 213 E, Phaedo 79 C, Soph. 230 B, Phaedr. 263 B, Parmen. 135 E, Laws 962 D. of thought than the others? Or are not they in like manner Footnote 15καὶ οὗτοι is an illogical idiom of over-particularization. The sentence begins generally and ends specifically. Plato does not care, since the meaning is clear. Cf. Protag. 336 C, Gorg. 456 C-D, Phaedo 62 A. compelled to admit that there are bad pleasures Footnote 16A distinct reference to Callicles’ admission in Gorgias 499 B
τὰς μὲν βελτίους ἡδονάς, τὰς δὲ χείρους
cf. 499 C, Rep. 561 C, and Phileb. 13 C πάσας ὁμοίας εἶναι
. Stenzel’s notion (Studien zur Entw. d. Plat. Dialektik, p. 98) that in the Philebus Plato ist von dem Standpunkt des Staates 503 C weit entfernt
is uncritical. The Republic merely refers to the Gorgias to show that the question is disputed and the disputants contradict themselves. ?Most assuredly.
The outcome is, I take it, that they are admitting the same things to be both good and bad, are they not?
Certainly.
Then is it not apparent that there are many and violent disputes Footnote 17ἀμφισβητήσεις is slightly disparaging, Cf. Theaet. 163 C, 158 C, 198 C, Sophist 233 B, 225 B, but less so than ἐρίζειν in Protag. 337 A. about it?
Of course.
And again, is it not apparent that while in the case of the just and the honorable many would prefer the semblance Footnote 18Men may deny the reality of the conventional virtues but not of the ultimate sanction, whatever it is. Cf. Theaet. 167 C, 172 A-B, and Shorey in Class. Phil. xvi () pp. 164-168. without the reality in action, possession, and opinion, yet when it comes to the good nobody is content with the possession of the appearance but all men seek the reality, and the semblance satisfies nobody here?
Quite so,
he said. That, then, which every soul pursues Footnote 19Cf. Gorg. 468 B
τὸ ἀγαθὸν ἄρα διώκοντες
, 505 A-B, Phileb. 20 D, Symp. 206 A, Euthyd. 278 E, Aristot. Eth. Nic. 1173 a, 1094 a οὗ πάντα ἐφίεται
, Zeller, Aristot. i. pp. 344-345, 379, Boethius iii. 10, Dante, Purg. xvii. 127-129. and for its sake does all that it does, with an intuition Footnote 20Cf. Phileb. 64 A μαντευτέον
. Cf. Arnold’s phrase, God and the Bible, chap. i. p. 23 approximate language thrown out as it were at certain great objects which the human mind augurs and feels after.
of its reality, but yet baffled Footnote 21As throughout the minor dialogues. Cf. What Plato Said, p. 71. and unable to apprehend its nature adequately, or to attain to any stable belief about it as about other things, Footnote 22Because, in the language of Platonic metaphysics, it is the παρουσία τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ that makes them good; but for the practical purpose of ethical theory, because they need the sanction. Cf. Introd. p. xxvii, and Montaigne i. 24 Toute aultre science est dommageable à celuy qui n’a Ia science de la bonté.
and for that reason failing of any possible benefit from other things,— in a matter of this quality and moment, can we, I ask you, allow a like blindness and obscurity in those best citizens Footnote 23As in the longer way
Plato is careful not to commit himself to a definition of the ideal or the sanction, but postulates it for his guardians. to whose hands we are to entrust all things?
Book 6