Section 440

But, I said, I once heard a story 1 which I believe, that Leontius the son of Aglaion, on his way up from the Peiraeus under the outer side of the northern wall, 2 becoming aware of dead bodies 3 that lay at the place of public execution at the same time felt a desire to see them and a repugnance and aversion, and that for a time he resisted 4 and veiled his head, but overpowered in despite of all by his desire, with wide staring eyes he rushed up to the corpses and cried, There, ye wretches, 5 take your fill of the fine spectacle! I too, he said, have heard the story. Yet, surely, this anecdote, I said, signifies that the principle of anger sometimes fights against desires as an alien thing against an alien. Yes, it does, he said. And do we not, said I, on many other occasions observe when his desires constrain a man contrary to his reason that he reviles himself and is angry with that within which masters him and that as it were in a faction of two parties the high spirit of such a man becomes the ally of his reason? But its 6 making common cause 7 with the desires against the reason when reason whispers low 8 Thou must not—that, I think, is a kind of thing you would not affirm ever to have perceived in yourself, nor, I fancy, in anybody else either. No, by heaven, he said. Again, when a man thinks himself to be in the wrong, 9 is it not true that the nobler he is the less is he capable of anger though suffering hunger and cold 10 and whatsoever else at the hands of him whom he believes to be acting justly therein, and as I say 11 his spirit refuses to be aroused against such a one? True, he said. But what when a man believes himself to be wronged, does not his spirit in that case 12 seethe and grow fierce (and also because of his suffering hunger, cold and the like) and make itself the ally of what he judges just, and in noble souls 13 it endures and wins the victory and will not let go until either it achieves its purpose, or death ends all, or, as a dog is called back by a shepherd, it is called back by the reason within and calmed. Your similitude is perfect, he said, and it confirms 14 our former statements that the helpers are as it were dogs subject to the rulers who are as it were the shepherds of the city. You apprehend my meaning excellently, said I. But do you also take note of this? Of what? That what we now think about the spirited element is just the opposite of our recent surmise. For then we supposed it to be a part of the appetitive, but now, far from that, we say that, in the factions 15 of the soul, it much rather marshals itself on the side of the reason. By all means, he said.